Verify polinrider before you run it

For polinrider 3.0.x latest

On this page
  1. Verify a release
  2. Releases before 3.0.0
  3. Verify the commits
  4. The honest part

You are being asked to run unknown code on a machine you may believe is compromised. That deserves more than a promise.

Signal What it proves
GPG-signed commits Every commit was made by the key holder. This is the direct counter to the campaign’s own backdated-amend technique
Attested releases Each release carries a sigstore .intoto.jsonl provenance attestation covering every archive, the Windows zip and the .deb packages, so you can verify the file came from this repository’s CI and not from someone’s laptop
SHA256SUMS on every release The file you downloaded is the file that was built
OpenSSF Scorecard 18 automated checks on the repository’s security posture, published so the badge resolves
CodeQL and Semgrep in CI Static analysis on every push

Verify a release

The same two checks for any asset: an archive, the Windows zip or a .deb.

sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS --ignore-missing
gh attestation verify polinrider-v3.0.0-macos-arm64.tar.gz --repo meSingh/polinrider-scanner

The Homebrew formula and the Scoop manifest carry the checksums from that same SHA256SUMS, so a package manager install is checked against it too.

Releases before 3.0.0

In 3.0.0 the repository was renamed from meSingh/polinrider-cleaner to meSingh/polinrider-scanner. Releases up to 2.3.0 were built and attested under the old name. Their SHA256SUMS and their signed tags check exactly as before. For their build attestation, --repo meSingh/polinrider-scanner does not work, but this one command checks a release from any version:

gh attestation verify polinrider-v2.3.0-macos-arm64.tar.gz \
  --owner meSingh \
  --cert-identity-regex '^https://github\.com/meSingh/polinrider-(cleaner|scanner)/\.github/workflows/release\.yml@refs/tags/v'

The old name, the offline check and how to prove an attestation came from this repository: Verifying releases from before 3.0.

Verify the commits

git log --show-signature -5

The honest part

None of this proves the tool is correct, only that it is the code this repository published. The source is deliberately readable for that reason: the binary is one Rust crate with no dependencies, the indicator set is plain text files, and every behaviour is pinned by a case in the conformance corpus.

Last updated:

Edit this page on GitHub